I think they said it in a blunt way, sure, but still, they didn't mean to be hurtful.
Artifice the Nightwing wrote:
Based on their post I can see that.
I agree with Silver. They weren't being "outwardly hateful". Their opinion was unfounded as Tsu said, and they were being stubborn, but not hateful, in my eyes.
I think we should end this conversation. There's no point of it anymore. They had their opinion, we argued against it, they aren't going to change that opinion, and they left. And now we're sitting here arguing over what their intentions were, without them there to speak for themselves, instead of us putting words in their mouth and just deciding that they were being hateful. This is going nowhere, so why don't we just end it?
I mean, it was kind of already over. You are the first person to reply in over three days.
Hey I was just saying that opinion can exist after fact . For instance, Moonbli is canon but I like Winterwatcher. Opinion after fact.
I also have nothing wrong with the lesbian or gay relationships in Wings of Fire. I was not trying to be hateful. I respect people’s opinions and I feel like we should respect each other’s thoughts.
What in those sentences were hateful.
I also have nothing wrong with the lesbian or gay relationships in Wings of Fire. I was not trying to be hateful. I respect people’s opinions and I feel like we should respect each other’s thoughts.
What in those sentences were hateful.
But Moonbli is... fictional, for one. And secondly, just because you like Winterwatcher doesn't mean you're trying to argue that it's canon instead of Moonbli. You simply like it more. "Umber isn't gay" is factually incorrect. "Dragons can't be gay" is also factually incorrect. "Homosexuality/bisexuality is unnatural" is also, guess what, factually incorrect.
yeah, what arti said; this was pretty dead until you brought it back to life
Yeah, that might be a good idea